United States v. Kisner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that express oral agreement with government agent was not binding because, among other factors, applicable regulations required contract to be in writing
• holding that express oral agreement with government agent was not binding because, among other factors, applicable regulations required contract to be in writing
• holding that express oral agreement with government agent was not binding because, among other factors, applicable regulations required contract to be in writing
• holding that federal regulations which impact agency relationships must be adhered to in order to form valid government contract
• determining that where applicable procurement regulations required Government contracts to be in writing, no oral contract was formed
• assessing plaintiffs challenge to cancellation of solicitation and denying plaintiffs request for bid preparation and proposal costs upon finding cancellation valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).