Skip to main content
· 9/12/1952

United States v. Yarborough

Citations

  • 1 C.M.A. 678
  • 1 USCMA 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiff's attempt to characterize its tax refund claim as a claim for recision of a contract based on mutual mistake of fact, and counseling fidelity to the mechanisms of the revenue laws unless Congress has expressly allowed a departure
  • “The Supreme Court has been very strict in insisting that, before the concept of an account stated can be used, it must be shown beyond peradventure that the Government has in fact agreed with, and communicated to, the taxpayer its intention to pay a stated sum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosman, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.