United States v. Kenneth Hacker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court had authority to revoke defendant’s supervised release where the warrant issued one day before the term of supervised release expired
• concluding the defendant’s past criminal conduct and “repeated violations of probation and supervised release” supported an upward departure
• de novo review; finding that district court had jurisdiction to revoke supervised release where revocation warrant was issued one day before supervised-release term expired
• no Fourth Amendment violation where petition to revoke supervised release was not supported by oath or affirmation but referenced indictment on which violation was based
• appellate court reviews district court’s authority to revoke de novo; district court had authority to revoke defendant’s supervised release where warrant was issued before term of supervised release expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).