United States v. Drema Lee Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court has jurisdiction to “hold hearings on petitions relating to violations of the conditions of supervised release that were filed during the pendency of the term of supervised release”
• holding that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) permitted courts to hold revocation hearings after the release period ended based on an explicit reference to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which included a “reasonable time” standard for holding revocation hearings
• revocation hearing authorized if revocation petition filed before expiration of supervised release
• hearing held 17 days after term expired
• hearing held 17 days after term expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).