Skip to main content
· 9/6/2022

United States v. Keith Matthews

Citations

  • 54 F.4th 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ‘‘[w]hen the court sua sponte revoked the child’s commitment to the peti- tioner, it acted outside the scope of its authority’’
  • ‘‘[t]he purpose of requiring written motions is not only to provide for the orderly administration of justice, but also to fulfill the fundamental requirement of due process of law’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.