United States v. Keisha Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the district court’s decision to revoke supervised release for an abuse of discretion, and the district court’s “subsidiary factfinding” for clear error
• “The district court has the discretion to revoke supervised release if the government proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).