Third Circuit· 10/18/2016

United States v. Kareem Bailey

Citations

840 F.3d 99
2016 WL 6081354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a “single, fleeting reference” to the defendant’s past conduct 4 unrelated to the offense at issue did not warrant a mistrial
concluding that the District Court had erred in admitting a substantially prejudicial video of a graphic murder, but that even this error was harmless in light of the strength of the evidence
holding that Rule 404(b) does not apply to video evidence of a murder in which the Government stipulated that none of the defendants engaged in or plotted to engage in the murder
affirming admission of evidence where district court explained relevance of prior conviction to defendant’s knowledge and to countering defendant’s claimed ignorance
affirming admission of evidence where district court explained relevance of prior conviction to defendant’s knowledge and to countering defendant’s claimed ignorance
“An evidentiary error is harmless if ‘it is 5 highly probable that the error did not contribute to the judgment[.]’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Jordan, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.