Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 3/28/2017

United States v. Ronald Repak

Citations

  • 852 F.3d 230
  • 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1406
  • 2017 WL 1149100
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of uncharged conduct with a limiting instruction was not unfairly prejudicial
  • holding the awarding of redevelopment funds to be an official act
  • the awarding of a contract by a redevelopment agency’s board of directors constitutes a “matter”
  • it is an “official act” for a public official to use his or her power to influence the awarding of government contracts, even if the official lacks final decisionmaking power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, McKee, Shwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.