Third Circuit· 3/28/2017
United States v. Ronald Repak
Citations
- 852 F.3d 230
- 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1406
- 2017 WL 1149100
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admission of uncharged conduct with a limiting instruction was not unfairly prejudicial
- holding the awarding of redevelopment funds to be an official act
- the awarding of a contract by a redevelopment agency’s board of directors constitutes a “matter”
- it is an “official act” for a public official to use his or her power to influence the awarding of government contracts, even if the official lacks final decisionmaking power
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, McKee, Shwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.