Third Circuit· 3/28/2017
United States v. Ronald Repak
Citations
- 852 F.3d 230
- 102 Fed. R. Serv. 1406
- 2017 WL 1149100
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admission of uncharged conduct with a limiting instruction was not unfairly prejudicial
- holding the awarding of redevelopment funds to be an official act
- the awarding of a contract by a redevelopment agency’s board of directors constitutes a “matter”
- it is an “official act” for a public official to use his or her power to influence the awarding of government contracts, even if the official lacks final decisionmaking power
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, McKee, Shwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Amy GonzalezThird Circuit· 2018-09-07· cited 108×
- SMI Owen Steel Co., Inc. v. Marsh USA, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 68×
- United States v. Herbert VedermanThird Circuit· 2019-01-16· cited 63×
- United States v. Chaka Fattah, Jr.Third Circuit· 2017-06-02· cited 29×
- United States v. Wayne JamesThird Circuit· 2020-04-03· cited 29×
- United States v. Robert DefreitasThird Circuit· 2022-03-21· cited 27×
- United States v. Robert McCabeFourth Circuit· 2024-06-03· cited 19×
- United States v. Chaka Fattah, Sr.Third Circuit· 2018-08-09· cited 6×
- United States v. Scott AllinsonThird Circuit· 2022-03-04· cited 5×
- United States v. SilverSecond Circuit· 2020-01-21· cited 1×
- United States v. DelgadoM.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-02-13· cited 1×
- United States v. Wayne JamesThird Circuit· 2020-01-23
- Miserendino v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 2018-04-02
- United States v. HillE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-04-18
- United States v. GilbertN.D. Alabama· 2018-10-22
- United States v. Khaled MiahThird Circuit· 2024-10-18
- Eric D. Bilharz and Anthony J. Pinto, Jr. v. Douglas A. CollinsVeterans Claims· 2025-08-14
Cites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 2,215×
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,629×
- Greer v. MillerSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,215×
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 686×
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 423×
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioThird Circuit· 1993-12-22· cited 357×
- United States v. GreenThird Circuit· 2010-08-09· cited 298×
- United States v. Yul Darnell Givan, United States of America v. Wayne TorrenceThird Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 288×
- United States v. Walter v. Cross, A/K/A Bobo Walter v. Cross, United States of America v. Jules C. MelograneThird Circuit· 2002-10-18· cited 283×
- UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493Third Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 279×
- McDonnell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-27· cited 265×
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A \Red\, John Hackett, A/K/A \Jack\Third Circuit· 1978-03-06· cited 258×
- United States v. Richard Caraballo-RodriguezThird Circuit· 2013-08-08· cited 236×
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1999-04-27· cited 229×
- Fahy v. HornThird Circuit· 2008-01-24· cited 222×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.