United States v. Karake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the government's assertion that it was aware of \no Brady information of the type described\
• accepting the government’s assertion that it was aware of “no Brady information of the type described”
• granting the defendants’ motion to compel discovery where the information sought was “crucial to their ability to file motions to suppress 24 [their] statements . . . , and may reveal mitigating evidence arising from the circumstances of their extradition”
• “The Government wisely does not contest the application of Brady at this stage of the proceedings to the statutory mitigating factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).