Skip to main content
· 10/18/1996

United States v. Joseph Thomas, Sr.

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1499
  • 321 U.S. App. D.C. 165
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27194
  • 1996 WL 595047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that admitting to the acts comprising a crime is not the same as accepting responsibility for the crime under the guidelines
  • noting that admitting to the acts comprising a crime is not the same as accepting responsibility for the crime under the guidelines
  • noting that “the actual holding in [Bryant] did not rest on the Jencks Act” since “the court did not decide that the missing [evidence] constituted a Jencks Act statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.