United States v. Jonathan S. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a defendant has constructive possession of a substance if it is being held by an agent of the defendant”
• noting the defendant’s conviction could not be sustained under an aiding and abetting theory because the purported principal, a government agent, never intended to complete the substantive crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. James P. Hornaday
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-12-13· cited 182×
• United States v. Woodard
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-06-27· cited 114×
• Isaac Seabrooks v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 2022-05-06· cited 54×
• United States v. Michael Anthony Conage
  Eleventh Circuit· 2022-09-30· cited 4×
• United States v. Campos-Ayala
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-06-07· cited 4×
• Derrick Lee Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-01-14
• Michael Anthony Conage v. United States
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2022-08-25
• United States v. Upia-Frias
  Virgin Islands· 2008-09-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Martin Gonzalez Munoz
  Fifth Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 308×
• United States v. Isiah Kitchen
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-07-27· cited 138×
• United States v. Derose
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-02-14· cited 78×
• United States v. William Thomas Martin
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-12-05· cited 76×
• United States v. William Wesley Pruitt, A/K/A Buddy Pruitt, Kim Curtis Danner
  Eleventh Circuit· 1985-06-21· cited 51×