United States v. Jonathan S. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a defendant has constructive possession of a substance if it is being held by an agent of the defendant”
• noting the defendant’s conviction could not be sustained under an aiding and abetting theory because the purported principal, a government agent, never intended to complete the substantive crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).