United States v. Isiah Kitchen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the constructive possession cases teach that a petitioner must have ultimate control over the drugs
• explaining that momentary handling of drug without assent to take dominion of it does not establish possession
• explaining that momentary handling of drug without assent to take dominion of it does not establish possession
• noting that the defendant had been seen at the house “on numerous occasions”
• noting that the defendant had been seen at the house “on numerous occasions”
• denying a sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge in part because the defendant admitted to living at the address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).