United States v. Jon Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because the employer was “headquartered here, Massachusetts ha[d] a ‘substantial relationship’ to the transaction” (citation omitted)
• application of Massachusetts law in action for prebirth judgment of parentage contrary to fundamental policy of New York, where New York law prohibits gestational carrier agreements and Massachusetts law permits them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).