United States v. Glen Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging In Re Barnett but distinguishing it where the non-appealing party can still be liable
• acknowledging In Re Barnett but distinguishing it where the non-appealing party can still be liable
• decision of issue unnecessary since New York courts would have applied the law in question retroactively.
• “We express no opinion on the law to apply where the 27 district court has not designated the applicable rules of professional responsibility (e.g., 28 state law, the Model Code of Professional Responsibility, or a federal common law of | professional responsibility
• relying on the reasoning of General Beverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).