Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 5/1/1992

United States v. John D. Rasco

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 132
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8776
  • 1992 WL 86209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that confinement in community treatment center after parole revocation was part of original term of imprisonment
  • holding that confinement in community treatment center after parole revocation was part of original term of imprisonment
  • holding that confinement in a community treatment center due to a parole revocation was “imprisonment”
  • stating that the Guidelines caution against attempting to achieve definitional coherence across numerous provisions
  • “We recognize that [our] interpretation arguably conflicts with the background commentary to section 4A1.1 [_which] seems to equate confinement sentences with sentences of imprisonment and distinguish both from residency in a halfway house.”
  • \We recognize that [our] interpretation arguably conflicts with the background commentary to section 4A1.1 [.... which] seems to equate confinement sentences with sentences of imprisonment and distinguish both from residency in a halfway house.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Guy, Batchelder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.