United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Hayter Oil Company, Inc. Of Greeneville, Tennessee, D/B/A Marsh Petroleum Company, and Sonny Wayne Marsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants had waived their claims when they “d[id] nothing more than make the conclusory assertion that their rights . . . were violated”
• finding that defendants had waived their claims when they “d[id] nothing more than make the conclusory assertion that their rights ... were violated”
• affirming a conviction for a five-year “conspiracy to control retail gasoline prices”
• same where parties made only a “conclusory assertion that their rights . . . were violated”
• \Substantial fines are an essential part of the sanction. It is estimated that the average additional profit attributable to price fixing is 10 percent of the selling price.\
• same where parties made only a “conclusory assertion that their rights ... were violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).