United States v. Jeter
Citations
- 5 Alaska 315
Syllabus
<p>1. Public Lands <&wkey;>39(4)—Injunction—Mandatory—1Town-Site Withdrawal.</p> <p>The Chugach Forest Reserve, including the land in controversy, was declared February 23, 1909. On May 8, 1910, the defendant settled on the land claimed by him in this action. He made application to enter the land, but the entry was never consummated, and on April 21, 1914, the land was included in executive order of withdrawal No. 1, for town-site purposes, under authority of the act of Congress approved March 12, 1914 (38 Stat. 305, c. 37), for the construction of the government railroad. Held, defendant had not acquired any vested right in the land, and, the executive withdrawal being valid, the defendant is a trespasser, and may be removed from the land by mandatory injunction.</p> <p>2. Public Lands <S&wkey;8—Trespasser—Injunction.</p> <p>AVhere a trespasser occupies public lands, he may be removed by mandatory injunction.</p> <p><@rxoSee same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court· 1911-05-03· cited 668×
- United States v. BernardNinth Circuit· 1913-02-03· cited 36×
- United States v. Brighton Ranche Co.U.S. Circuit Court· 1885-05-15· cited 15×
- United States v. Brighton Ranch Co.U.S. Circuit Court· 1885-11-16· cited 8×
- United States v. Cleveland & Colo. Cattle Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado· 1888-01-09· cited 7×
- United States v. Henrylyn Irr. Co.D. Colorado· 1912-11-25· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.