Skip to main content

United States v. Jeter

Citations

  • 35 M.J. 442
  • 1992 CMA LEXIS 1031
  • 1992 WL 295210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if an accused is aware of the convening authority’s “personal interest” in a case and fails to object, the accused waives the issue
  • holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
  • holding defect in referral by accuser not jurisdictional
  • issue of convening authority’s disqualification to refer case waived by knowing failure to raise it at court-martial
  • “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”
  • “We are inclined to believe that generally a violation of Article 22(b) is waived if an accused and his counsel are well aware thereof and make no objection or protest at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Everett, Gierke, Wiss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Jeter

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.