United States v. Jerry Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the courts of appeals[’] . . . exclusive jurisdiction . . . to determine the validity of final FCC forfeiture orders”
• in section 504(a) action, district court was “limited to considering the factual basis for the agency action” but not petitioner’s “legal arguments”
• “[W]e agree with the district court that its 6 FCC v. AT&T, INC. THOMAS, J., dissenting jurisdiction was limited to considering the factual basis for the agency action”
• “Persons aggrieved by a final FCC forfeiture order must raise legal challenges to the validity of the order in a timely petition for review in the appropriate court of appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• AT&T v. FCC
  Fifth Circuit· 2025-04-17· cited 6×
• Sprint Corporation v. FCC
  D.C. Circuit· 2025-08-15
• AT&T v. FCC
  Fifth Circuit· 2025-08-22
• Verizon Commc'ns Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  Second Circuit· 2025-09-10
• FCC v. AT&T
  Supreme Court· 2026-06-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-03-27· cited 31×
• Unnamed case
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-02-25· cited 29×
• United States v. Stephen Paul Dunifer
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-20· cited 28×
• William Leigh Dougan v. Federal Communications Commission, United States of America
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-20· cited 23×
• Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 21×
• United States v. Any And All Radio Station Transmission Equipment
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 6×

Other cases named United States v. Jerry Stevens

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Jerry Stevens
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-08-22