United States v. Jerry Stevens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the courts of appeals[’] . . . exclusive jurisdiction . . . to determine the validity of final FCC forfeiture orders”
• in section 504(a) action, district court was “limited to considering the factual basis for the agency action” but not petitioner’s “legal arguments”
• “[W]e agree with the district court that its 6 FCC v. AT&T, INC. THOMAS, J., dissenting jurisdiction was limited to considering the factual basis for the agency action”
• “Persons aggrieved by a final FCC forfeiture order must raise legal challenges to the validity of the order in a timely petition for review in the appropriate court of appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).