E.D. Pennsylvania· 10/11/1960
United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corporation
Citations
- 187 F. Supp. 545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “. . . the essential element is ... the specific intent to monopolize.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Dusen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 1,936×
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,717×
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,218×
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 891×
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-03-04· cited 581×
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2001-06-28· cited 502×
- Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationFifth Circuit· 1977-03-25· cited 250×
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone CompanyNinth Circuit· 1975-04-25· cited 204×
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Second Circuit· 1967-12-15· cited 186×
- United States v. Sealy, Inc.Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 173×
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 167×
- United States v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 153×
- Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1971-09-09· cited 152×
- Irving Sulmeyer and Arnold L. Kupetz, Co-Trustees in Bankruptcy for Bubble Up Corporation v. Coca Cola CompanyFifth Circuit· 1975-07-11· cited 151×
- Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm CorporationFourth Circuit· 1969-08-18· cited 145×
- Bernard Susser v. Carvel Corporation, Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc., Carvel Stores Realty Corporation, and Eight Other CasesSecond Circuit· 1964-05-08· cited 131×
- Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc.Third Circuit· 1976-06-14· cited 121×
- Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1976-09-02· cited 114×
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1977-03-29· cited 106×
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Medical Service Ass'n of PennsylvaniaThird Circuit· 1984-10-01· cited 87×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1945-03-12· cited 1,016×
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 844×
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-11-17· cited 691×
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-02-13· cited 677×
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 418×
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1922-04-17· cited 322×
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 231×
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1936-04-27· cited 165×
- United States v. General Motors CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1941-05-01· cited 139×
- United States v. CattoSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 118×
- General Motors Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 98×
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationS.D. New York· 1958-11-20· cited 86×
- United States v. LaurelliM.D. Pennsylvania· 1960-08-19· cited 10×
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.D. Delaware· 1937-01-16· cited 7×
- United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.S.D. New York· 1935-12-02· cited 7×
- Emsig Manufacturing Co. v. Rochester Button CompanyS.D. New York· 1958-07-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.