· 6/6/1966
United States v. Catto
Citations
- 384 U.S. 102
- 86 S. Ct. 1311
- 16 L. Ed. 2d 398
- 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is not the province of the court to weigh and determine the relative merits of systems of accounting.”
- cash method of accounting for livestock expenses more convenient but less accurate than accrual method because of failure to match income and expense; taxpayers denied permission to switch to cash method with respect to breeding stock
- cash method of accounting for livestock expenses more convenient but less accurate than accrual method because of failure to match income and expense; taxpayers denied permission to switch to cash method with respect to breeding stock
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.