Sixth Circuit· 9/27/1996

United States v. Jerome L. Murphy

Citations

96 F.3d 846
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 25250
1996 WL 546865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that lack of mens rea requirement in USSG § 2K2.1(b)(4) does not violate due process
noting that \[a] statute may provide criminal liability without mens rea consistent with due process if it is a regulatory measure in the interest of public safety\
noting that “[a] statute may provide criminal liability without mens rea consistent with due process if it is a regulatory measure in the interest of public safety”
noting that this court does not infer mens rea requirement when interpreting the Guidelines
distinguishing Staples, finding mens-rea-less offense-level increase did not violate due process
differentiating “the requisite intention for conviction of a crime” from “sentencing enhancements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Kennedy, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.