United States v. William Richard Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Lopez “strongly implies” that the jurisdictional element in provisions like section 922(g) is sufficient
• upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and noting that “Every court of appeals that has been faced with this question since Lopez has held that the jurisdictional element of § 922(g) provides the requisite nexus with interstate commerce that [the former] § 922(q) lacked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).