United States v. James Stuart, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Strickland analytical framework to a claim that counsel violated the defendant’s right to testify
• applying the Strickland analytical framework to a claim that counsel violated the defendant’s right to testify
• applying the Strickland analytical framework to a claim that counsel violated the defendant’s right to testify
• no showing that failure to recall Government’s witness prejudiced case
• identifying tax‐protester argument that wages are not income
• identifying tax‐protester argument that wages are not income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).