Skip to main content
· 2/10/1993

United States v. James Michael Brown

Citations

  • 985 F.2d 478
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 1919
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1009
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 2014
  • 1993 WL 29060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court’s determination that it- lacks discretion to depart from the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo
  • appellate review proper where record supports inference that court's refusal to depart rested on court's belief that it lacked authority to depart
  • age at time of prior convictions and nature of those convictions are proper factors to consider in determining whether career offender status significantly over-represents seriousness of defendant’s criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Norris, Tanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.