United States v. Andrew Earl Chapnick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the factual similarity of prior offenses is relevant to the “common scheme or plan” inquiry
• noting that fact that crimes involved different victims is a factor other courts have frequently deemed determinative in holding prior offense unrelated to each other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).