United States v. James Lee Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the in pari delicto rule to prevent the return of $25,000 which the claimant gave to an undercover agent in an attempt to purchase hashish
• applying the in pari delicto rule to prevent the return of $25,000 which the claimant gave to an undercover agent in an attempt to purchase hashish

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. James Leroy Martinson
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-02-27· cited 226×
• Ginter v. Stallcup
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-03-06· cited 34×
• Tosco Corp. v. Hodel
  D. Colorado· 1985-05-01· cited 29×
• Eduardo Mantilla v. United States of America U.S. Customs Service
  Third Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 27×
• United States v. $3,000 in Cash
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-11-29· cited 16×
• Marathon Oil Co. v. Lujan
  D. Colorado· 1990-06-20· cited 14×
• Ginter v. Stallcup
  E.D. Arkansas· 1986-06-11· cited 12×
• Kardoh v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-10· cited 10×
• United States v. Kim
  E.D. Virginia· 1990-06-15· cited 4×
• Ginter v. Stallcup
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-04-19· cited 1×
• Mantilla v. United States
  Third Circuit· 2002-09-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. William C. Farrell
  D.C. Circuit· 1979-08-27· cited 100×
• United States v. Ortega
  S.D. New York· 1978-05-18· cited 11×
• United States v. Smith
  N.D. Iowa· 1980-09-16· cited 4×