United States v. James Gunnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no error where the district court determined that an officer’s testimony regarding pacing was credible and established probable cause to conduct a traffic stop
• the defendant “failed to contest” the reliability of the dog’s performance in controlled testing environments and “offered nothing to call into question the particular alert at issue in this case”
• routine but somewhat time-consuming tasks related to the traffic violation can include a computerized check of the vehicle’s registration and the driver’s license and criminal history, as well as the preparation of a citation or warning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).