Skip to main content
· 4/7/1992

United States v. James A. Benson

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 707
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 679
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6255
  • 1992 WL 67864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no evidentiary error when the information was corroborated by other evidence
  • finding no evidentiary error when the information was corroborated by other evidence
  • judge who has personally observed defendant’s testimony must make express finding of perjury, but need not specifically identify a particular perjurious statement
  • law enforcement officers who wrote down the declarant’s statements did not testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Magill, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.