· 4/7/1992
United States v. James A. Benson
Citations
- 961 F.2d 707
- 35 Fed. R. Serv. 679
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6255
- 1992 WL 67864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no evidentiary error when the information was corroborated by other evidence
- finding no evidentiary error when the information was corroborated by other evidence
- judge who has personally observed defendant’s testimony must make express finding of perjury, but need not specifically identify a particular perjurious statement
- law enforcement officers who wrote down the declarant’s statements did not testify
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Magill, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.