United States v. Kim Allen Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding adjustment for obstruction of justice where district court had stated: “[a]fter a thorough review of the facts of this case, the Court concludes that the defendant’s testimony was, at least in part, false”
• the “district court itself must find that the defendant committed perjury before making the upward adjustment” for obstruction of justice
• standard of review; district court must find defendant committed perjury and no reasonable trier of fact could find testimony true
• \[n]o enhancement should be imposed based on the defendant's testimony if a reasonable trier of fact could find the testimony true\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).