Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 10/7/2008

United States v. Jackson

Citations

  • 544 F.3d 1176
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21052
  • 2008 WL 4479153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Assistant United States Attorney may file information requesting sentence enhancement based on prior conviction even though statute says that information must be filed by “the United States attorney”
  • noting that “motions in limine ... clearly are excluded under” the Speedy Trial Act
  • personal approval requirement in § 3742(b) is non-jurisdictional
  • personal approval requirement in § 3742(b) is non-jurisdictional
  • personal approval requirement in § 3742(b) is non-jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Hull, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.