United States v. Larry Darnell Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “once the Sixth Amendment’s speedy trial analysis is triggered, it is appropriate to consider inordinate pre-indictment delay in determining how heavily post-indictment delay weighs against the [gjovemment”
• concluding that a two-year post- indictment delay, when considered in light of a two-and-a-half-year pre-indictment delay, weighed heavily against the government
• holding that two-year delay caused by egregious government negligence created presumption of prejudice
• holding that a two-year delay from indictment to trial resulted in a speedy trial violation when the first three factors weighed against the State and there was no actual prejudice
• holding that a two-year delay weighed heavily against the government when the arresting officer knew where the defendant lived and worked and made only weak efforts to contact the defendant
• holding that a two-year delay weighed heavily against the government when the arresting officer knew where the defendant lived and worked and made only weak efforts to contact the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).