Eleventh Circuit· 11/9/2007
United States v. Jackson
Citations
- 506 F.3d 1358
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26127
- 2007 WL 3307238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing, along with several other circuits, this narrow holding of Patane.
- “Be- cause Jackson’s firearm is physical evidence and he concedes that his unwarned statement was voluntary, Patane allows the admis- sion of Jackson’s firearm.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marcus, Pryor, Hancock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-17· cited 44×
- Kessler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 4×
- United States v. Chaidez-ReyesN.D. Georgia· 2014-02-10· cited 2×
- United States v. HicksN.D. Georgia· 2008-04-10
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-01
- United States v. Steven George MorganEleventh Circuit· 2025-07-11
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 619×
- United States v. Timothy Keith YuknavichEleventh Circuit· 2005-08-11· cited 54×
- United States v. James David Nichols, United States of America v. James David NicholsFourth Circuit· 2006-02-28· cited 47×
- United States v. BrathwaiteFifth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 45×
- United States v. PhillipsTenth Circuit· 2006-11-15· cited 17×
- United States v. Henry C. RenkenSeventh Circuit· 2007-01-31· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.