Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 4/18/1994

United States v. Jackson

Citations

  • 19 F.3d 1003
  • 1994 WL 135355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that the district court’s conclusion that [insanity acquittee] failed to prove he was entitled to release is a finding of fact . . . .”
  • holding '‘that the district court’s conclusion that [insanity acquit-tee] failed to prove he was entitled to release is a finding of fact.... ”
  • holding “that the district court’s conclusion that [insanity acquittee] failed to prove he was entitled to release is a finding of fact . . . .”
  • “Section 4243 does not require that Jackson be [conditionally] released simply because there are mechanisms whereby he could be ciosely monitored on an outpatient basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Smith, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.