Eleventh Circuit· 5/20/2015
United States v. J. Patrick Brester
Citations
- 786 F.3d 1335
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8312
- 2015 WL 2393697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a defendant must “prove that the prosecution withheld favorable evidence” to estab- lish a Brady violation
- “[W]e have repeatedly held that the failure to disclose ‘merely cumulative’ impeachment evidence does not establish prejudice.”’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Pryor, Baldock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court· 1992-01-14· cited 954×
- United States v. SchleiEleventh Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 287×
- United States v. Charles Joseph Hogan, A/K/A Hal Winter Michael TrupeiEleventh Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 274×
- Kelley v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2004-07-23· cited 232×
- United States v. George A. VallejoEleventh Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 169×
- United States v. Roberto ValeraEleventh Circuit· 1988-05-20· cited 54×
- United States v. William T. BurnsFifth Circuit· 1982-02-26· cited 35×
- Levis Leon Aldridge, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1991-02-20· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.