Kelley v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one ineffective-assistance argument was unexhausted despite the petitioner’s general presentation of a Strickland claim in the state courts
• holding that petitioners are required to present ineffective assistance of counsel claims in the same “manner of clarity” throughout appellate review
• holding that one ineffective-assistance argument was unexhausted despite the petitioner’s general presentation of a Strickland claim in the state courts
• holding that one ineffective-assistance argument was unexhausted despite the petitioner’s general presentation of a Strickland claim in the state courts
• holding that one ineffective-assistance argument was unexhausted despite the petitioner’s general presentation of a Strickland claim in the state courts
• holding that the district court should give the petitioner “the choice of returning to state court to exhaust his claims or of amending and resubmitting the habeas petition to present only exhausted claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).