United States v. Hoover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s “overly technical” argument “that the indictment failed to allege a false statement because ‘complained’ and ‘told’ are not synonymous terms”
• rejecting defendant’s “overly technical” argument “that the indictment failed to allege a false statement because ‘complained’ and ‘told’ are not synonymous terms”
• alleging one false statement in indictment but proving another at trial was constructive amendment
• reversing and remanding based on a constructive amendment of the indictment, where, inter alia, the defendant “may have reasonably relied on the indictment and only prepared a [limited] defense”
• “[W]hen the [G]overnment chooses to specifically charge the manner in which the defendant’s statement is false, the [G]overnment should be required to prove that it is untruthful for that reason.”
• “[W]hen the [G]overnment chooses to specifically charge the manner in which the defendant’s statement is false, the [G]overnment should be required to prove that it is untruthful for that reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Hoover

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Hoover
  D. Nebraska· 1904-12-27· cited 7×
• United States v. Hoover
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-09-19· cited 6×
• United States v. Hoover
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1987-08-13· cited 6×
• United States v. Hoover
  Second Circuit· 2005-10-24· cited 3×
• United States v. Hoover
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1955-08-19· cited 1×
• United States v. Hoover
  W.D. Kentucky· 1939-07-12· cited 1×
• United States v. Hoover
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-09-19
• United States v. Hoover
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-03-01
• United States v. Hoover
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-08-26