United States v. Herbert R. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 & 2315: stolen securities
• conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 & 2315: stolen securities
• “The Government is correct that [the witness’s] proposed testimony regarding the events . . . is not new, since [the witness] told [Ouimette]’s counsel a similar story three weeks before the trial.”
• “[A] court must exercise great caution in considering evidence to be ‘newly discovered’ when it existed all along and was unavailable only because a co-defendant, since convicted, had availed himself of his privilege not to testify.”
• statement of brother, not co-defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).