United States v. Caesar Bottone, Seymour Salb, and Nathan Sharff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking into account defendants’ “eager[ ] invest[ment of] a large portion of their time” stealing and selling industrial secrets in valuing the stolen material
• “[W]hen the physical form of the stolen goods is secondary in every respect to the matter recorded in them, the transformation of the information in the stolen papers into a tangible object never possessed by the original owner should be deemed immaterial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).