Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 12/15/1997

United States v. Hebert

Citations

  • 131 F.3d 514
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35141
  • 1997 WL 768615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing a sentence mandated under § 924(c) as “unjust, cruel, and irrational”
  • “[A]rgument that the Hobbs Act must be interpreted to require a substantial, rather than de minimis, effect on commerce . . . is foreclosed by Robinson and subsequent cases.”
  • managers and owners testified that restaurants and liquor stores robbed bought products from out-of-state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeMOSS, Dennis, Per Curiam, Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Hebert

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.