Skip to main content
· 12/15/2008

United States v. Haygood

Citations

  • 549 F.3d 1049
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25023
  • 2008 WL 5204929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “prejudice is effectively presumed when allocution is overlooked because of the difficulty in establishing that the allocution error affected the outcome of the district court proceedings” (cleaned up)
  • “The relevance of each factor will vary according to the ‘circumstances surrounding the original entrance of the plea as well as the motion to withdraw.’” (quoting Triplett, 828 F.2d at 1197)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Sutton, Kethledge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.