· 12/13/1957
United States v. Hamill
Citations
- 8 C.M.A. 464
- 8 USCMA 464
- 24 C.M.R. 274
- 1957 CMA LEXIS 309
- 1957 WL 4759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A motion for reconsideration should be considered with ‘exceptional care”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferguson, Latimer, Quinn, Whom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.