United States v. Eymer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is apparent that some portion if not all of the sentence was to be suspended on probation and the ambiguities in the agreement should be resolved in the appellant’s favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Davis
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-07-26· cited 10×
• United States v. Whitekiller
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1979-08-10· cited 8×
• United States v. Neal
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1977-03-11· cited 2×
• United States v. Harcrow
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1980-04-30· cited 1×
• United States v. Cook
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1980-06-18· cited 1×
• United States v. Rodriquez
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1981-10-30· cited 1×
• United States v. Jeter
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2021-09-27
• United States v. Swofford
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1981-04-16
• United States v. Henry
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1984-07-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Care
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1969-08-29· cited 1,103×
• United States v. Hamill
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1957-12-13· cited 32×