United States Court of Military Appeals· 9/30/1992
United States v. Graf
Citations
- 35 M.J. 450
- 1992 CMA LEXIS 1032
- 1992 WL 295212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment ap- plies to servicemembers at special courts-martial
- affirming the effectiveness of the UCMJ and Court of Military Appeals in protecting military judges from conflicts with their own “security of tenure” and “financial security” in the context of the military chain of command and performance evaluation system
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1994-11-10· cited 366×
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 321×
- United States v. CrumpleyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1998-12-22· cited 271×
- United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-10-19· cited 139×
- United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1992-12-21· cited 120×
- United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-05-28· cited 105×
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-04-29· cited 74×
- United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-08-03· cited 57×
- United States v. JanssenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2014-04-15· cited 54×
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-09-30· cited 50×
- Center for Constitutional Rights v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2013-04-16· cited 45×
- United States v. NorfleetCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-08-16· cited 36×
- United States v. EastonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2012-06-04· cited 33×
- United States v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-09-08· cited 28×
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1993-05-24· cited 25×
- United States v. McCantsUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1994-03-04· cited 22×
- United States v. CamposCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1995-08-23· cited 21×
- United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1992-12-15· cited 19×
- United States v. LawsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1993-04-19· cited 18×
- United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1992-11-25· cited 18×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,658×
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-11-08· cited 1,331×
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,183×
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 1,180×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court· 1972-11-14· cited 834×
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 724×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 705×
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1953-06-15· cited 669×
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-04-28· cited 658×
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National CommitteeSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 580×
- Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 560×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.