United States v. Gilbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he complete preemption doctrine does not apply to the area of copyright, as not every case involving federal copyright laws arises under those laws such that federal jurisdiction is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Woodsville Guar. Sav. Bank v Silverstein
  D. New Hampshire· 2011-11-02

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Old Chief v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
• Nathan L. Drew v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
• United States v. Hector M. Rodriguez-Estrada
  First Circuit· 1989-06-14· cited 181×
• United States v. Lotsch
  Second Circuit· 1939-02-27· cited 134×
• United States v. Irwin Halper
  Second Circuit· 1979-02-23· cited 104×
• United States v. Frankhauser
  First Circuit· 1996-04-09· cited 81×
• United States v. Trenkler
  First Circuit· 1995-07-18· cited 79×
• United States v. Sheldon Arthur Yefsky
  First Circuit· 1993-05-03· cited 78×
• United States v. Gilbert
  First Circuit· 1999-06-21· cited 76×
• United States v. Alfred Scivola, Jr.
  First Circuit· 1985-07-02· cited 72×
• United States v. John L. Tracy, United States of America v. John L. Tracy, United States of America v. John L. Tracy
  First Circuit· 1993-05-17· cited 61×
• United States v. Diallo
  First Circuit· 1994-07-14· cited 53×
• United States v. Olgivie O'Brien Williams
  First Circuit· 1993-02-12· cited 51×
• United States v. Esperanza Aguilar-Aranceta
  First Circuit· 1995-09-05· cited 50×
• United States v. Kent E. Gray
  First Circuit· 1992-03-04· cited 49×
• United States v. Rosario-Peralta
  First Circuit· 1999-04-28· cited 44×
• United States v. Donald Francis Stackpole, United States of America v. Ray J. Norton, Jr.
  First Circuit· 1987-02-13· cited 34×
• United States v. Jordan
  First Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 30×