Skip to main content
· 9/9/2011

United States v. Gansman

Citations

  • 657 F.3d 85
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18664
  • 2011 WL 3966133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No particular wording or phrasing is required for an instruction to be legally sufficient, so long as, taken as a whole, the instruction correctly conveys the applicable law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Chin, Keenan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.