Third Circuit· 8/18/1977
United States v. Frumento
Citations
- 563 F.2d 1083
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that impairment \depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding\
- intervention properly denied where intervenor claims only indirect half interest in joint venture profits
- “The existence of ‘impairment’ depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding.”
- “The existence of ‘impairment’ depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding.”
- that original party and potential intervenor had a conflict as to splitting profits between each other did not constitute a conflict preventing adequate representation where those parties had no conflict as to the legal issue in dispute with their common opponent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldisert, Rosenn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.