Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 8/18/1977

United States v. Frumento

Citations

  • 563 F.2d 1083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that impairment \depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding\
  • intervention properly denied where intervenor claims only indirect half interest in joint venture profits
  • “The existence of ‘impairment’ depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding.”
  • “The existence of ‘impairment’ depends on whether the decision of a legal question involved in the action would as a practical matter foreclose rights of the proposed intervenors in a subsequent proceeding.”
  • that original party and potential intervenor had a conflict as to splitting profits between each other did not constitute a conflict preventing adequate representation where those parties had no conflict as to the legal issue in dispute with their common opponent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldisert, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.