United States v. Everhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s objection to a sentencing enhancement did not create a “factual dispute” when the defendant failed to object to the specific facts in the PSR supporting the enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Michael Mustread
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-12-19· cited 182×
• United States v. Louis Edward Henry, Jr.
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-07-03· cited 165×
• United States v. Ronald Alan Ennenga
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 120×
• United States v. George M. Parrott
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-07-06· cited 56×

Other cases named United States v. Everhart

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Everhart
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-08-26