United States v. Ronald Alan Ennenga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even without evidence of distribution, the desire to protect a “large and valuable stash” can be compelling
• finding that the use of weapons and an alarm system support that the house was a “fortress,” even where firearm and drug evidence were found in different locations within the house
• finding that the use of weapons and an alarm system support that the house was a “fortress,” even where firearm and drug evidence were found in different locations within the house
• noting that unpublished decisions are not controlling precedent (citing 6 Cir. R. 28(g)
• applying defer ential standard to the district court’s application of the enhancement under the “fortress theory” to the undisputed facts of the case
• involving the recovery of a “sizeable stash of marijuana plants” and various firearms in defendant’s locked and alarm-rigged basement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).