Skip to main content
· 8/15/2000

United States v. Eugene Edward Martin

Citations

  • 221 F.3d 52
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20012
  • 2000 WL 1134522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the fact that the national median for a broadly stated offense type may be above or below a particular defendant's [sentencing range] cannot be used to justify a sentencing departure”
  • ending analysis upon determining that sentencing court relied on forbidden information in departing
  • prohibiting departures based on \factors that offend the framework and purpose of the guidelines\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Lipez, Casellas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.